On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 6:48 AM Ina Panova <ipan...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 7:55 PM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Wanted to bump this to hopefully get some feedback. Also, today during >> our CI/CD meeting we discussed also tracking issues for pulp-oci-images on >> github as well. >> >> If there are no objections by next week April 26, I'll assume I can >> proceed with moving these projects' issues over to Github. >> >> David >> >> > I have no objections regarding moving plugin_template and pulp-oci-images > to github. > > The question I have is - what is our long term goal? Do we aim to > eventually move all of the projects from pulp.plan.io? I know there were > discussions in the past but we have not found a solution on how to connect > issues with downstream trackers. The concern I have, if we don't have such > plan, then we might have plugins' issue tracking scattered between plan.io > and github where users, as a result, will file issues in the redmine and > then we will need to whether ask them to open a github issue or do it > ourselves. > We just had a python issue filed in the redmine last week. > This is a good point. I just looked at bugzilla, and 'Github' is listed as one of the Systems you can "Add Link" to. We'd (obviously) need to modify the linking/state-change-scripts. The complicating issues I can see there, are a) not having moved *all* the projects to github, so some BZs would want links to redmine and some to github, and b) being able to get "all" the issues - in redmine, I can go to pulp.plan.io/issues and see all the issues for every project, not sure we can get something equivalent from github. G > >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:38 AM David Davis <davidda...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I've always felt that tracking plugin_template issues under the main >>> pulp project in plan.io was suboptimal and with other repos such as >>> pulp-cli moving to github issues, I feel that it might make sense for the >>> plugin_template to move to github issues as well. >>> >>> There's only 11 open issues right now in pulp.plan.io? for the >>> plugin_template so I think it would be an easy move. I'd propose we also >>> remove the plugin_template tag from the list of options (but keep it on old >>> issues for history). >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> David >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-dev mailing list >> Pulp-dev@redhat.com >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev > -- Grant Gainey Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev