On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 17:24 -0700, Mike McCune wrote: > On 06/14/2010 04:56 PM, Mike McCune wrote: > > I pointed out to jortel in this irc conversation: > > > > http://pastie.org/1004640 > > > > that when fetching a package with the REST api based on the package's ID > > the query looks like: > > > > GET /packages/(u'test_consumerwithpackage', u'1', u'1.2.3', u'1.el5', > > u'x86_64', > > u'9d05cc3dbdc94150966f66d76488a3ed34811226735e56dc3e7a721de194b42e')/ > > > > > > which is exceedingly nasty and hard as a caller to know what the heck to > > construct. > > > > To that end I'm going to switch from this type of ID for Package objects: > > > > - self._id = str((name, epoch, version, release, arch, checksum)) > > + self._id = str(uuid.uuid4()) > > > > I'm actually considering switching all our objects to use UUIDs for > > their primary keys. This means any object could be found with: > > > > /object/{uuid} > > > > which looks like: > > > > GET /packages/1c8838f0-be76-4b62-a0cf-c450a5d618e2/ > > > > you can still get packages matching by doing: > > > > GET /packages/?name=some-name&arch=i386 > > > > which will also find all matching packages with the params specified. > > > > Thoughts? > > Mike > > Just pushed the change for Package class. Prad, note the: > > test_api.test_consumerwithpackage > > test is failing and I left it that way since you are reworking how all > the consumer -> package association goes. > > Mike
Will the (name, epoch, version, release, arch, checksum) tuple still be unique? Will the "GET /packages/?name=some-name&arch=i386" call return the uuids? -- Dennis _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
