Pradeep Kilambi wrote:
Should we allow the case where, user creates a repo with a feed, syncs
down the content and then tries to upload additional content to the
same repo?
Pros:
* A user probably will have an easy time adding custom content to
their repos without having to create new repos
Cons:
* We need to regenerate metadata for the repo. Today we get the
metadata for repos with feed directly from the feed.
* Will need to worry about what version of RHEL/Fedora pulp is running
on for compatible yum metadata.
* For Red Hat repos, we probably dont want to allow this anyway. So
we'll need some extra rules to bypass this.
Overall seems like keeping uploads separate from feed repos is
cleaner. User can always create a new repo, upload content and
subscribe to both repos to get that additional content.
Agree with Prad. Costs are too high as compared to gain. I vote for not
allowing user to upload additional content to repo with a feed.
Lemme know your feedback.
~ Prad
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
--
Sayli Karmarkar
[email protected]
Systems Management
http://www.redhat.com
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
