Todd B. Sanders wrote:
On 10/12/2010 03:56 AM, Sayli Karmarkar wrote:
I have added design approach for supporting repository cloning at:
https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/RepositoryCloning
Feel free to add your thoughts / suggestions to wiki or in this email
thread.
Thanks,
Thanks Sayli.
* I'm not sure I see the benefit in modeling a parent_repo or a
cloned_repo. Why treat this any different that a repo with a feed?Not
even sure that we need to persist the parent_id. What specific use
cases lead you to believe that model changes are required?
I was thinking we might have to know about the relationship between a
parent and a cloned repo. Adding parent_repo_id to Repo model will
permit that.
Example usecase: What happens when a parent repo of a feeded cloned
repo is deleted? We need to either delete cloned repo or make it feedless.
*Yes, errata is a requirement. In the end, these are repos, and
should have the same functionality.
Sorry I was sort of vague in explaining this. What I meant is - do we
want functionality of cloning with selected errata (similar to what we
have in spacewalk )? By default cloned repo will have all errata from
parent repo.
-Todd
--
Sayli Karmarkar
[email protected]
Systems Management
http://www.redhat.com
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list