On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:54:35PM -0400, Jason Dobies wrote: > Nosetests has been used since the beginning, but I'm not sure it was > necessarily for any specific reason. I'd be up for hearing about > alternatives. And the RHEL thing isn't an issue, we fully control the Hudson > boxes. >
I'm not advocating not using nose, a mocking solution would be in addition to nose. Nose is great for test discovery, running, coverage, etc. But, it doesn't provide any solution for mocking objects, function calls, and the like. -- -- James Slagle -- _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
