So how then do I mix the two ? “Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes)
----- Phil Gardner <[email protected]> wrote: > I am actually just now setting up a similar environment. From what I can > tell, Pulp is better at managing repos with keeping track of package > versions, and can push updates out to the consumers without actually > interacting with the server (consumer). > > I have been testing with adding a second non-ssl vhost to Pulp's apache > and using that url as the install/updates repos when kickstarting > (inside cobbler kickstart templates). Or you could just import the base > install trees into cobbler and just use that for installs. Each would work. > > Any other important differences between the two? Some of their > functionality does overlap, but pulp is better at dealing with lots of > repos, and cobbler is great for managing kickstart stuff. > > On 10/26/2011 11:40 AM, Dan White wrote: > > I have a Cobbler/Puppet/Kickstart environment I am running with, but I am > > running into problems maintaining a local set of repo mirrors. > > > > Is it possible to roll Pulp into this mix ? > > > > “Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere > > in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.” > > Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pulp-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > > -- > _____________________ > Phil Gardner > PGP Key ID 0xFECC890C > OTR Fingerprint 6707E9B8 BD6062D3 5010FE8B 36D614E3 D2F80538 > > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
