On 12/14/2011 07:38 AM, Jay Dobies wrote:
On 12/13/2011 04:28 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 12/14/2011 06:49 AM, Jay Dobies wrote:
I'm not ignoring this, I'm just so deep into the unit association stuff
that I'm afraid I'd do physical damage to my brain if I were to try to
shift gears and think about this. I'll take a look in the next few days.
No worries - the "jam it all into the exception message" approach is a
tolerable workaround for the moment, since the key requirement is for
admins to be able to see the partial sync logs for jobs that fail, so
they have some chance of figuring out what went wrong.
I just wanted to bring it up as something to look at before the plugin
APIs are declared stable.
Well there's the trick. I'm gonna go the Google route and call them
"beta" for as long as possible so I can always make these changes and
tell people the APIs were never stable. :)
Heh, it works to my benefit to - it means I can say "this is annoyingly
difficult" and know that the situation can still be improved.
I figure between the need to support your existing yum-based repos and
my "let rsync do most of the work" directory tree mirroring we should be
able to thrash out something fairly reasonable (especially once I start
working on the rsync delta file transfer process for snapshot trees that
will also involve a custom distributor plugin).
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
Red Hat Engineering Operations, Brisbane
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
