On 09/22/2014 10:49 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Hey Pulp People! > > I've noticed that we have a lot of stale branches on github. Could each > of you check out the branches that github thinks are stale, and delete > them if you think they don't need to be there anymore? > > https://github.com/pulp/pulp/branches/stale > https://github.com/pulp/pulp_puppet/branches/stale > https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/branches/stale > > Also, I've personally been making an effort to work more out of rbarlow > forks instead of making branches in the upstream repo. It might be worth > considering trying that too. It has a few benefits: > > 1) You don't have to put your name in the branch anymore because it's > part of your own namespace. > 2) It avoids having so many branches on upstream, leaving only the ones > that are "official". > 3) You earn some additional git street cred ☺
+1. Also it makes git push mistakes less consequential since you can only break stuff in your own fork:) _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
