I have some slightly schizophrenic yum servers which depending upon user agent will return packages or html views. Seems because Pulp's python-requests library downloads, rather than urlgrabber (and other obvious RPM user agents), html is happily downloaded and then treated as an RPM package on the filesystem.
Even worse: it's treated by Pulp as *genuine* RPM content: able to be copied between repo's, published as metadata et al. It's only when a yum client actually attempts to deploy the package that checksums do not match. I have fixed my end now; but since all of this information is available on feed sync: would it not be worth checksumming the download and taking action (probably electing to ignore the package) if for whatever reason a checksum is inconsistent? Alan _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
