-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 +1
On 10/07/2015 02:06 PM, Michael Hrivnak wrote: > I propose that we do not facilitate upgrading directly to pulp 2.8 from any > release earlier than 2.4. I > could easily be talked into drawing the line at 2.5. > > With the tremendous amount of refactor work going on in 2.8, maintaining > those old migrations is more > challenging than ever. Many used code that is now being heavily modified or > deprecated. We will save a > lot of time and headache by removing migrations from 2.8 that were introduced > prior to 2.4. > > The small number of users who may still be on 2.3 or earlier can upgrade to > 2.4 - 2.7 first, and then > upgrade to 2.8+. > > Feedback? Concerns? > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list > Pulp-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWFYWDAAoJEM9lW7UwFwZXeNoP/0wSaiapz9L8sUDa7UW4aZEN j8SmtJ61p4CX3rOCH9Eb1RUcFeKaijBJukk1qqlZemyKMmyolgWRlkG6ixXh9YEn Vld4GLT8gZR4+F4y4GghD9Q/lVqwRLeiqr7nsFjnwsl4oTjJMFEfrixZpm5dn5yg tZ6bE0QaJoQbGIVl9eYMMBjqvzl9CU9VRNQ2/AOWbr71+oZfsZIY9l6HEf7zIgsO EabSEMXY/fl+uQlRsik1GBRiiWsab68gt6RGThiswPECycTukWUk2A1ScKWK4QXT P17yHMGD0xQEReXafoPYFgO9FpdhSS4y7FgI55GkLrG8ViOT6Z8sakMttPh7byfI ylZJRphpHcVqos3fcmDOSpcduswzjZFBuDC9MoNUu8jlWM1gNcjfU3z6XGvhluK8 DipEMd7Crh62JkGYjZw8XaHzcbB5fy1Ui1+Y64pptsgmejotnRXit8M3Zxb7BuoB /8hqXY4srV2Hvu96jo1WwYwFSJ93HnUcUsJS/o5keuA9S9pzD9eWf33G64gZ9j6v 9K1fcq4lu8QkMECXVe8vK+jivjRXOMMy49dZPEjzdNuCsSYsEVM1uv2wMIPgkGtG ZonZ7xvF391V+TCnhwSRno8FLlZyGCSAUUNswTW7VTwE+5ZoKbW3RrblLxyMUSD2 3+06ml7l4w/XQUEajc/2 =I1ev -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list