On Wednesday, May 4, 2016 9:24:40 AM EDT Dennis Kliban wrote: > I see value in keeping around older builds. That is the reason for having a > 'tested-nightly' directory that contains the last build that passed all > pulp-smash tests. How many of the passing builds would we want to keep > around? > > The 'nightly' directory contains packages that were built successfully. > However, may not have passed tests. How many of the past nightly builds > should we keep?
I only have arbitrary answers to these questions, but perhaps 3-7ish days? Or we could make it complicated and keep a strange pattern with gaps in it. Where 0 is today, and -1 is yesterday, etc., something like this: 0 -1 -2 -4 -8 -16 -32 Obviously since the window slides, we can't have the -8 slide too since we deleted yesterday's -7 already. This idea is over complicated, but also kind of neat so I thought I'd share. Really, just 3 days is fine. _______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list