Ah yep, that makes perfect sense. I was previously seeing some issues syncing Pulp with Spacewalk on Pulp version 2.4.. the repo sync log kept showing errors that hundreds of errata were being skipped due to empty package list.. I've since reinstalled Pulp with version 2.8 and that seems to have cleared things up.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhriv...@redhat.com> wrote: > Using good-old curl, grep, and wc, I also came up with 3645 errata in the > RHEL 6 current "server" repo for x86_64 on the Red Hat CDN. One possible > explanation for seeing more errata at the RHN link is that some of them > might be architecture-specific, and thus wouldn't show up in the x86_64 > repo you sync'd. There are probably some other reasonable explanations as > well. > > One way or another, you definitely got all of the errata that are > available in that repo on the Red Hat CDN. > > Michael > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Matthew Madey <mattma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> When I sync Pulp with the RHEL repositories, I notice I'm missing >> hundreds of Errata.. even though I don't have any errors when running the >> sync. For instance, looking at my RHEL6 repo in Pulp, it shows 3645 >> Erratum. When I look at Red Hat's advisory board ( >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-6-errata.html), it shows 3,837 >> Errata. >> Why the discrepancy? >> >> Display Name: rhel-x86_64-server-6-base >> Description: None >> Content Unit Counts: >> Erratum: 3645 >> Package Category: 10 >> Package Group: 202 >> Rpm: 35911 >> Yum Repo Metadata File: 1 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-list mailing list >> Pulp-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >> > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list Pulp-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
