On 2 May 2017 3:20:28 AM NZST, Brian Bouterse <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Dagen, > >For Pulp 3.0.0, the feature set is mostly known with user use cases >tracked >in a document on the wiki. The doc [0] is written as a minimum viable >product so we can deliver something that provides Pulp's core value in >a >timely manner and then we can add features to it over time. Some >notable >gaps include no authorization, nodes has been removed, and so have >scheduled calls. One notable addition is a legitimate Plugin API to >ease >the burden for plugin writers adding content support. > >Pulp3 will only use PostgreSQL, which will entirely replace Pulp's >usage of >mongodb. It's good to hear this will match your standard operating >environment. > >In terms of Nagios, I'm more familiar with that as a management system >instead of httpd. I'd have to hear more about what you would like in >terms >Nagios support. In terms of using Nagios for monitoring, the Status API >is >available in Pulp2 and will also be in Pulp3. > >There is a developer mailing list called pulp-dev which is where most >of >the Pulp3 discussion is currently happening. You can join it [1] or >read >the archives [2]. We also have weekly calls [3] where each week we >refine a >section of the MVP with more details. > >If you have specific use cases, suggestions, or ideas, please let us >know! >We would really like some alpha/beta testing, which we hope to be >starting >soon but we are just a bit early for. Right now making sure the use >cases >are sound is one of the best ways to contribute. > >[0]: >https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_Viable_Product >[1]: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >[2]: https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/ >[3]: https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/2017-April/msg00010.html > >-Brian > > >On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Dagan McGregor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have been looking at installing Pulp for managing our local rpm >> repositories and I am curious about what changes are planned or >confirmed >> for Pulp 3.0. >> >> Our site standard is to run PostgreSQL and Nagios for services >wherever >> possible, having migrated off httpd. >> >> Will Pulp 3.0 continue using MongoDB or will other databases like >> PostgreSQL be supported as well? >> >> And are there any plans to have Nagios support alongside the current >httpd? >> >> I did find a blog article but nothing else mentioned. I am happy to >help >> with some testing if it would be useful. >> >> Cheers, >> Dagan McGregor >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >>
Hi Brian, Thanks for the reply. I had a major brain fade. I meant to say *Nginx support* for web services. As Homer would say, D'oh! I see the current design uses httpd and mod_wsgi. I assume not all features may match with using something like Nginx and uWSGi. It would be nice as an option if possible, if changes are still being considered. I will join the dev list to follow the discussions there. Cheers, Dagan McGregor
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
