+1 David
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:07 AM Dennis Kliban <[email protected]> wrote: > I've received some off-list feedback on this decision. As a result, this > change is no longer going to happen. Pulp 3 services will instead be > renamed to > > pulpcore-resource-manager > pulpcore-workers > pulpcore-worker-{n} > > The problem with renaming Pulp 2 services is best summarized by Ewoud[0]. > > [0] > https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/100#pullrequestreview-248572656 > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 3:09 PM Dennis Kliban <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Users of Pulp 2 wishing to upgrade to Pulp 3 will want to be able to run >> both versions on the same machine for the duration of their migration from >> one to the other. Supporting such a use case requires changing some of the >> systemd unit names for Pulp 2 services. Starting with Pulp 2.20.0, the >> following service names will be used: >> >> pulp2_resource_manager >> pulp2_workers >> pulp2_worker-{n} >> >> We realize that this is a backwards incompatible change that goes against >> semantic versioning principals. Please refer to the developer mailing list >> for background for this decision[0]. >> >> >> [0] https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2019-March/msg00085.html >> > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
