The docs are out of date[0]. The bindings should use an OpenAPI schema requested with the 'bindings' GET parameter. Here is an example[1]. I'll update the docs.
[0] https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/integration-guide/index.html#client-in-a-language-of-your-choice [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-openapi-generator/blob/master/generate.sh#L7 On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:04 AM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) < [email protected]> wrote: > I tried adding the client api by using openapi generator and installing > from pypi. It looks the client api method name are different. > > the pypi module has short name. > >>> dir(pulpcore.client.pulp_rpm.api.RemotesRpmApi) > ['__class__', '__delattr__', '__dict__', '__dir__', '__doc__', '__eq__', > '__format__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__', '__hash__', > '__init__', '__init_subclass__', '__le__', '__lt__', '__module__', > '__ne__', '__new__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', > '__setattr__', '__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__weakref__', > 'create', 'create_with_http_info', 'delete', 'delete_with_http_info', > 'list', 'list_with_http_info', 'partial_update', > 'partial_update_with_http_info', 'read', 'read_with_http_info', 'sync', > 'sync_with_http_info', 'update', 'update_with_http_info'] > > > Openapi generated classes has longer name. > >>> dir(pulp3_client.api.RemotesRpmApi) > ['__class__', '__delattr__', '__dict__', '__dir__', '__doc__', '__eq__', > '__format__', '__ge__', '__getattribute__', '__gt__', '__hash__', > '__init__', '__init_subclass__', '__le__', '__lt__', '__module__', > '__ne__', '__new__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', > '__setattr__', '__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__weakref__', > 'remotes_rpm_rpm_create', 'remotes_rpm_rpm_create_with_http_info', > 'remotes_rpm_rpm_delete', 'remotes_rpm_rpm_delete_with_http_info', > 'remotes_rpm_rpm_list', 'remotes_rpm_rpm_list_with_http_info', > 'remotes_rpm_rpm_partial_update', > 'remotes_rpm_rpm_partial_update_with_http_info', 'remotes_rpm_rpm_read', > 'remotes_rpm_rpm_read_with_http_info', 'remotes_rpm_rpm_sync', > 'remotes_rpm_rpm_sync_with_http_info', 'remotes_rpm_rpm_update', > 'remotes_rpm_rpm_update_with_http_info'] > > > I am wondering why they are different and which one I should use? > > Thanks > > > From: [email protected] At: 10/17/19 11:16:35 > To: Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK ) <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 3 Python client > > Yes, up until we the 3.0 GA in December, we're not supporting release to > release upgrades. So upgrading from release to release (or nightly to > nightly) is not guaranteed to work. > > David > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:12 AM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, I pulled nightly build and it worked. Thanks a lot. Do you know if >> it is required to erase the database when update from previous nightly >> build? I had some weird 500 errors until I drop all db tables and rerun the >> migration. >> >> From: [email protected] At: 10/16/19 12:29:21 >> To: Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK ) <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Pulp 3 Python client >> >> I've just confirmed that the latest pulp-rpm-client package on PyPI no >> longer has this problem. However, this latest package only works with the >> code on master branch. A new pulp_rpm package should be published to PyPI >> soon. >> >> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:29 PM Dennis Kliban <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This is a known problem with the OpenAPI schema[0]. Once the PRs for is >>> 5550[1] are merged, a new version of the client will be published to PyPI >>> and this problem will be resolved. I believe that should take place on >>> October 9th[2]. >>> >>> [0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5093 >>> [1] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5550 >>> [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/2019-October/msg00031.html >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:13 PM Bin Li (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK) < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I have tried to follow the blog >>>> https://pulpproject.org/2018/09/04/generate-pulp-3-python-client-using-swagger-codegen/ >>>> and got a syntax error. >>>> File >>>> "/opt/utils/venv/pulp/3.6.5/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/pulp3_client/models/update_record.py", >>>> line 79 >>>> def __init__(self, href=None, created=None, type=None, id=None, >>>> updated_date=None, description=None, issued_date=None, fromstr=None, >>>> status=None, title=None, summary=None, version=None, type=None, >>>> severity=None, solution=None, release=None, rights=None, pushcount=None, >>>> pkglist=None, references=None): # noqa: E501 >>>> ^ >>>> SyntaxError: duplicate argument 'type' in function definition >>>> >>>> Type is declared twice in the __init__. There is a duplicate key 'type' >>>> in attribute_map models/update_record.py. >>>> >>>> attribute_map = { >>>> 'href': '_href', >>>> 'created': '_created', >>>> 'type': '_type', >>>> 'id': 'id', >>>> 'updated_date': 'updated_date', >>>> 'description': 'description', >>>> 'issued_date': 'issued_date', >>>> 'fromstr': 'fromstr', >>>> 'status': 'status', >>>> 'title': 'title', >>>> 'summary': 'summary', >>>> 'version': 'version', >>>> 'type': 'type', >>>> 'severity': 'severity', >>>> 'solution': 'solution', >>>> 'release': 'release', >>>> 'rights': 'rights', >>>> 'pushcount': 'pushcount', >>>> 'pkglist': 'pkglist', >>>> 'references': 'references' >>>> } >>>> >>>> Anyone knows how this can be fixed? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Pulp-list mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pulp-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list > > >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
