https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56993
--- Comment #10 from Tanu Kaskinen <ta...@iki.fi> ---
(In reply to Arun Raghavan from comment #6)
> I'm quite against the idea of having codec support in PulseAudio itself.
>
> In my opinion, the right way to do this is to first move our RTP support to
> use GStreamer under the hood, and then potentially use that to do encoding
> if needed.
The RTP modules are not useful when talking about a tunnel setup or a direct
client-server connection over TCP. Can you clarify, are you against any
compressed audio implementation in the native protocol, and if yes, why
exactly?
There's a new version of the opus patch, and I thought I'd start reviewing it:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/169038/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-bugs mailing list
pulseaudio-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs
