Hello Tanu,

On jeu., 2013-12-05 at 11:29 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-07 at 11:34 -0500, Hajime Fujita wrote:
> > This patch set adds a support for UDP version of RAOP (so called
> > raop2). Most of the RAOP devices (e.g. AppleTV, AirportExpress,
> > third party AV receivers) today use UDP version, so this patch
> > set is expected to support those devices.
> > 
> > While there are still some remaining issues, and testing has not
> > been done thoroughly, we'd like to have a review so that we can
> > discuss some design/style issues as early as possible.
> 
> This patch set is now the oldest one in our queue, so I plan to start
> reviewing it soon. Has the RAOP work moved on after these patches were
> submitted? If so, could you send an updated patch set?
> 

The work we are doing on the RAOP module is on github, in a repo managed
by Hajime [1]. And yes, the code did move on after the patches send
here... 

Moreover, there are a few commits that I haven't submitted yet to
Hajime. Basically it brings an implementation for password
authentication, plus a large re-factoring that aims at merging old TCP
code path into the new UDP version. As of now, there are quiet some
duplication between the two implementations.

I don't know if Hajime has time to build a new set of patches. On my
side, I need a few more weeks to finish re-factoring and testing the TCP
code. So it's probably better to wait for a new version I guess, or, at
least, for Hajime opinion on that. Anyway, thanks for the interest in
our work !

[1] https://github.com/hfujita/pulseaudio-raop2/commits/raop2-for-merge1

Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Reply via email to