On 03.10.2017 14:58, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 14:32 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 02.10.2017 11:31, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Sun, 2017-10-01 at 20:31 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
On 01.10.2017 18:16, Tanu Kaskinen wrote:
On Sat, 2017-08-19 at 17:48 +0200, Georg Chini wrote:
+/* List handlers */
+char *pa_core_message_handler_list(pa_core *c);
Putting this function to core-messages.h doesn't seem right to me. The
function will never be used outside core.c, so the it should be a
private function in core.c.

If I put it in core.c, I would need to expose the pa_core_message_handler
structure, which you wanted to keep private.
I think it actually makes sense to make the struct public. It could be
private if it didn't have the description field, but since the handler
objects contain information that clients can query, they're similar to
all other core objects. I think it even makes sense to move the struct
to a separate message-handler.h header (but if you don't like that
idea, I'm fine with keeping it in core-messaging.h or moving it to
core.h).
You want a header file just for this struct? I would keep it in
core-messages.h but if you prefer, I don't mind using a
separate file.
Indeed, creating a separate header just for the struct definition
doesn't make much sense. After thinking this a bit more, I still like
the idea of having message-handler.[ch] for the message handler object,
  though. The message-handler.h header could include not only the struct
definition, but also the following functions:

pa_message_handler_new()
     (renamed from pa_core_message_handler_register())
pa_message_handler_free()
     (renamed from pa_core_message_handler_unregister)
pa_message_handler_set_description()
     (renamed from pa_core_message_handler_set_description())

The only thing left in core-messaging.h would be
pa_core_send_message(), and I'd move that to core.h.

But do as you like, I don't care about this that much.

I don't like using pa_message_handler_new() because the function
does not create a new message handler, but only registers it. I don't
mind dropping the _core_ part from the names. I would then also
rename pa_core_send_message() to
pa_message_handler_send_message() and put it in the same header
file.
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Reply via email to