Hi Pali,

Does it have to be codec switching? If there was to be an implementation that settles on the best quality codec available that is supported by both sides of communication, it would already be over and beyond what currently exists. The order is obvious as of today:

LDAC

AptX HD

AptX

AAC

SBC

BlueZ already follows this logic, it is just that PA does not register any capabilities other than SBC.

Allowing forced codec selection through the GUI is nice to have, but given the complexity of implementing it, may not be worth the hassle for the initial milestone.


On 22/07/18 09:51, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hi!

On Sunday 22 July 2018 00:10:47 Georgi Boiko wrote:
Hi,

Does anybody know what happened after this discussion? Is this long overdue
upgrade on the roadmap?

https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2017-July/028398.html
See this thread:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2018-July/030198.html

Basically there is a patch for aptX support, but that one just replace
SBC by aptX. So need to decide which codec to support at compile time.

This is current limitation of bluez - linux bluetooth daemon - which
does not support codec switching.

See also this thread:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2018-July/030253.html

So until bluez is extended to support switching and configuring A2DP
codec, there would not be support for any other codec then SBC.


_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss

Reply via email to