On Thursday 13 September 2018 11:23:58 Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 19:03 +0300, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 1) What to do with aptX? It is really useful for users to have it in > > > Linux & pulseaudio? Because it looks like that the only thing which it > > > has better is lower latency. But can pulseaudio on Linux system really > > > achieve it? > > > > I don't think, not the level of latency necessary for speech and to > > avoid lip sync issues, so that would leave aptX at the same category > > as SBC. > > How likely is it that a device that supports aptX only supports lower > SBC bitrates? In such situation aptX would apparently be an > improvement, but maybe that doesn't happen in real life.
Such combination does not make sense for me. I do not see reason why headset would support only low SBC mode which is either due to slow bluetooth stack or slow DSP and also aptX at higher bitrate... I have not heard about such hardware. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
