Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 08.10.08 21:06, Knut-Håvard Aksnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is it possible to set up the asynchronous API in such a way that
latency information is updated before the first audio fragment appears,
and ideally updated with every arriving audio segment?
I am trying to merge the audio with video from other sources, and need
precise latency information, within a tolerance of 15ms for the entire
audio stream.
No, this is unfortunately not possible.
I thought about including timing information in every single PCM data
transfer. But there's nothing concrete yet. Sorry.
Including timing information in every PCM data transfer is exactly what
I want. Please consider it again at a later stage, at the time being the
existing timing information is probably "good enough" for my customer.
(I am working as consultant.) The code I am working on will probably be
made available under an open source license at a later stage when the
code has been stabilized.
begin:vcard
fn;quoted-printable:Knut-H=C3=A5vard Aksnes
n;quoted-printable:Aksnes;Knut-H=C3=A5vard
org:Aksnes Software
adr;quoted-printable:;;Barbug=C3=A5rdsveien 35;4846 ARENDAL;;;Norway
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Software consultant
tel;cell:+47 928 23 680
note;quoted-printable:Organisasjonsnr. 992557575=0D=0A=
=0D=0A=
Programvare relaterte konsulent tjenester: Utredning, utvikling og tilpas=
sning.=0D=0A=
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.tirsdagsklubben.nu/~kna
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
pulseaudio-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
