On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:16 -0500, Bill Cox wrote: > Ok, the new "glitchless" code sounds cool. Reducing the interrupts > seems close to pointless from a power savings view, unless we're in an > embedded environment where we slow down the CPU and lower it's power > on sub-second intervals. Otherwise, copying the data the data to the > sound buffer will heavily dominate power.
Why would the power concerns not apply on laptops and netbooks? -- Arun _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
