On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:23:50PM -0500, pl bossart wrote: > Ideally we should enforce a stronger smoothing on the time estimation, > there's no reason why such variations should occur. I forced the > smoothing history to 20s, maybe there's a better way to do this.
FWIW a lot of impleementations seem to struggle to keep track of time properly over silence periods so it's worth resetting things whenever you get one. Adapting the jitter buffer depth rather than the sample rate also helps if the source is having difficulty - it can be due to network issues, and this does absorb changes up and down without needing to be too smart. _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@mail.0pointer.de https://tango.0pointer.de/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
