Issue #1716 has been updated by luke. Category set to RAL Status changed from Unreviewed to Accepted Assigned to set to community Target version set to unplanned
The problem with the services file is that there is no guarantee of uniqueness anywhere -- you can have a port with two names (one for each proto), a name with two different ports, etc. Given this, it's impossible to correctly model these files with Puppet until we get composite resource identifiers, which will only be possible once elmo/0.25 is released. ---------------------------------------- Feature #1716: What is the status of the port type http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/1716 Author: thegcat Status: Accepted Priority: Low Assigned to: community Category: RAL Target version: unplanned Complexity: Unknown Affected version: 0.24.6 Keywords: /etc/services ports If I read commit:bb80c1bb correctly, Luke had started a port type to manage ports in /etc/services. What's the status on this? ---------------------------------------- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://reductivelabs.com/redmine/my/account --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Bugs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
