Issue #17030 has been updated by Adrien Thebo.

I spoke with Jeff about this and the preferred resolution is to try pip if it's 
available and then fall back to pip-python on Redhat. On other platforms we 
just just probe for pip.

In addition it might be worthwhile to check the pip version to ensure that 
we're getting the python pip instead of the perl pip.
----------------------------------------
Bug #17030: pip provider should handle multiple pips/pythons
https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/17030#change-83703

Author: Bradley Kreider
Status: Needs More Information
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: provider
Target version: 
Affected Puppet version: 2.6.17
Keywords: 
Branch: https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet/pull/1486


The Pip provider should provide a way to specify the path to pip.  This would 
allow people to manage multiple python installs, by point to the one they want 
to install into.  

In RHEL, this makes it easy to have a non-system python installed somewhere 
(ie: 2.7 or 3.x) and let puppet manage the python packages.

This is related to bug #15980.  (related in the way that if you could provide 
the path to the pip binary, 15980 would have a workaround).


-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
http://projects.puppetlabs.com/my/account

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Bugs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-bugs+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-bugs@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-bugs?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to