Luke Kanies schrieb: > On Oct 31, 2008, at 10:33 AM, jerico wrote: >> I don't agree on that. It might be a specially declarative and less >> procedural/imperative language and is probably not turing complete (no >> idea about that, I didn't try the proof!) But maybe this is just an >> argument about wording and therefore not so important. > > I agree it's mostly a terminology point, but it's definitely not > Turing-complete, although Brice might have slipped that in with his > last series of updates. :)
I beg to differ. Puppet manifests have recursion (define) and choice (if ). In my reading that's enough for turing completeness. Regards, DavidS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
