2009/1/5 Jos Backus <[email protected]>: > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:16:11PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote: >> Heh, well, it's not trivial, exactly; at least, not without making a >> new commit. > > Sure. > >> I noticed your Puppet 1.9 portability bug; I ran Puppet against 1.9 >> recently and I don't think that was the only problem. It's worth >> opening a portability bug for Facter and treating it separately, IMO. > > Previous patch is for Puppet (master); > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/show/1850 has the equivalent Facter > patch.
Thanks will get to review probably Friday due to work commitments, maybe it'd be worth setting up a ruby 1.9 hudson instance for puppet/facter so we don't regress. Paul --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
