On Jan 16, 2009, at 5:59 PM, James Turnbull wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Paul Lathrop wrote:
>> An alternative approach which addresses bot GitHub stability and
>> potential confusion, but still buys us the features available on
>> GitHub, is to have the RL repo set up to "mirror" the GitHub repo (or
>> vice-versa). A regular push/pull scheduled via cron might accomplish
>> the task.
>
> I already do this. Both my repo and the RL repo got updated at the
> same
> time for the last couple of months to help people when confused.
>
> So happy to do this.
This makes the most sense, I guess, especially since only a few people
will ever push to these repositories.
>
>> I think that the workflow for the maintainers could also be improved
>> using GitHub as a tool, which is part of why I recommended it. You
>> can
>> get the gem version of Puppet built "for free"; pull requests could
>> potentially ease the patching process, etc.
>
> Agreed.
Am I doing it wrong? I find pull requests to be more annoying than
useful. I can't trigger the pull from github, doing the pull doesn't
make the pull request go away; how is a pull request on github any
better than an email directly to the branch maintainer?
--
The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe
is that it has never tried to contact us.
--Calvin and Hobbes (Bill Watterson)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
