On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Luke Kanies <l...@madstop.com> wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Ohad Levy wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Luke Kanies <l...@madstop.com> wrote: >> >> >> I could see some other version numbers making their way to the URI at >> some point, but those would likely be per-resource, rather than site- >> wide, and each resource type has a lot of control over how its portion >> of the URI is managed. >> >> Which kind of versions? If you mean module versions, than I would >> prefer to have an environment build out of it rather then directly >> accessing the modules. > > I mean API versions. E.g., right now, the URI always looks like this: > > /$indirection_name/$key > > where $indirection_name is the type of resource, such as node, > catalog, facts, etc., and $key is the specific resource (which can be > a further portion of a URI, such as a relative file name). > > So we could say that this counts as version 1.0 of the API. Then say > we change it to look like: > > /$environment/$indirection_name/$key > > And we might say that's v2.0. > > Really, we should probably do something like: > > /$version/$environment/$indirection_name/$key > > Or maybe: > > /$environment/$indirection_name/$version/$key > > So that the indirection types can be versioned independently. Hmm. > Yeah, I think I like that best. > > Thoughts?
If you're going to go down this path, I would say you'd definitely want the indirection types to be versioned independently. -- Nigel Kersten Systems Administrator Tech Lead - MacOps --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
