Luke Kanies schrieb:
>>>> Note: the user tags are not stored in the rails database except
>>>> under
>>>> the special resource parameter tag. This also doesn't seem right.
>>> Really? So if someone sets 'tags' parameters on a resource, they're
>>> not stored in the db as parameters?
>> No they're stored as a parameter but not as a tag.
>> And the built rails query matches tag as parameter.
>> So you can't do:
>>
>> class myfile {
>> @@file { ... }
>> }
>> File<<| tag == "myfile" |>>
>>
>> My idea would be that we should persist user tag as tag _and_
>> parameter
>> and that tag queries should query the persisted tags.
>
> I agree -- the two tag lists should be entirely equivalent. They are
> on the client, but since we rely on tags on the server, they should be
> made equivalent there, too.
Yes, please :) I was bitten by that recently and was wondering why I
couldn't collect resources by tags.
Regards, DavidS
--
dasz.at OG Tel: +43 (0)664 2602670 Web: http://dasz.at
Klosterneuburg UID: ATU64260999
FB-Nr.: FN 309285 g FB-Gericht: LG Korneuburg
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
