On Sep 15, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:25:59AM -0700, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:55:04AM -0700, Luke Kanies wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 31, 2009, at 8:52 AM, S H wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Did that help at all? Is there additional information I can get
>>>>> for
>>>>> you?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Shawn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, your email is on my todo list, I've just been at a
>>>> conference
>>>> and traveling and stuff. I'll get to it early this week.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if you managed to have a look at this?
>>
>> Yeah, I replied to the email a while back, and then (I think) Shawn
>> started emailing me directly.
>
> Is there an outcome yet? Did this turn out to be a limitation in
> puppet?
Essentially, yes -- the ParsedFile system is predicated on each
provider class having its own record list and a unique file.
It shouldn't actually be a huge change to fix this, it just means
having a more global record list and mapping to file names, with a
little less attachment to the individual classes.
--
Now and then an innocent man is sent to the legislature.
--Kin Hubbard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
