On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:43 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > >> >> Hi all >> >> I've been looking at the tickets for 0.26.0 and think perhaps we >> should rename this release to 1.0.0. >> >> It makes logical sense to me given the remaining REST migration. > > I think we should rename it to a codename, and stop talking about > version numbers. > > Early decision on versions is exactly how we got in the two year hell > that was 0.25, and just using codenames until release is the easiest > way to avoid it. I've been meaning to switch the 0.26 release name to > a codename (we can always change it on release). > > Seem reasonable? >
For developers it probably sounds good... but for business managers being sold on it, it does not make as much sense. They like boring things numbered versions and such. The higher the sell the more they want a nice solid IBM like number. -- Stephen J Smoogen. Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for? -- Robert Browning --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
