I think from the bracketing text: Defined types can also use metaparameters, for instance we can use ‘require’ > inside of a definition. We can reference the values of those metaparameters > using built-in variables. Here’s an example: >
....and: > The above is perhaps not a perfect example,... ...that the intent of the example is to show what you can do (reference metaparameters as if they were variables) rather than what you should do. Perhaps what's needed is a more compelling case of why you might actually want to access metaparameters inside a defined type, and then just ditch the existing example? -- Markus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
