On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Thomas Bellman <bell...@nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On 2010-06-15 08:57, Luke Kanies wrote: > >> On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Markus Roberts wrote: > >>> P.S. Personally, I think stripping out all pretense of handling >>> multiple environments in a single process is the way to go, but I >>> understand the concerns that make that an unpopular direction. > >> Tell it to the users. :/ > > Speaking as a user, I don't much care if it is a single process or > multiple processes. What I do want is that it should be easy to > configure multiple environments, and that the puppetmaster doesn't > consume too much resources. > > It is quite conceivable for the puppetmaster daemon to look in the > config file for which environments exist, and fork off one sub-daemon > for each environment. The "main" daemon would then bascially only be > a proxy between the clients and the environment-specific daemons. > > (The forking could of course be done on demand when a client requests > a specific environment, so unused environments don't consume server > memory.)
I don't really care how this is handled either, but I'm in favor of anything that enforces the barriers between environments more strongly. > > > /Bellman > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en. > > -- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
