On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:40, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:04, Ohad Levy <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 15:02, Andrew Forgue <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Dec 14, 6:15 pm, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 03:10, Andrew Forgue
>> >> >> <[email protected]>
[...]
>> > Does it make sense to add another lookup for the CA server?
>>
>> I think in the longer term it would make sense to do an SRV lookup for
>> each unique service that Puppet uses; SRV lookups (RFC2782)
>> distinguishes based on service and protocol. Which, I think, would be
>> vaguely in conflict with the CA requirement, since that uses the same
>> puppet service (as in, TCP port) for communication.
>
> It doesn't *necessarily* use the same port remember, it just does by
> default.
Getting DNS-SD / SRV stuff working would require that it *never* used
the same port, which I suspect is not a winning strategy. :)
Regards,
Daniel
--
✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ [email protected] ☎ +61 401 155 707
♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
