No, that is more than sufficient. I will transfer my complaints to our tools admins, since apparently I can't see your CLA in our list, but it is there. :(
Daniel I suppose if computers all just worked we would be out of a job though... On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 05:14, Boštjan Škufca <[email protected]> wrote: > > "A Contributor License already exists, signing again is not allowed." > Is that not enough? :) > > b. > > > On 27 January 2011 07:51, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:12, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> G'day Bostjan. >> >> A few days back I wrote: >> >> > The one last thing missing if we are going to fold this in is a CLA >> > for puppet. That just confirms that you have a right to give us this >> > code, that we can distribute it, etc; the text on the website is >> > pretty clear: >> > https://projects.puppetlabs.com/contributor_licenses/sign >> >> It would be really cool if you could take a look at that, and sign it. >> It is slowing up integration of this patch a bit, and while I can >> rewrite it to avoid missing-CLA hassles from folks, I would rather >> not. :) >> >> Regards, >> Daniel >> -- >> ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com >> ✉ Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> >> ✆ Contact me via gtalk, email, or phone: +1 (877) 575-9775 >> ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons > > -- ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com ✉ Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> ✆ Contact me via gtalk, email, or phone: +1 (877) 575-9775 ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
