> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Markus Roberts <mar...@puppetlabs.com> > wrote: > > One thought, looking through the code (I haven't given it a thorough read > > yet) is that it may make sense to split the MS Windows provider off from > the > > posixs provider (though that's out of scope here, I think). >
It definitely makes sense now that exec actually has providers. As > you say though, this was out of scope for the work we were currently > doing which was just to split as much as possible to allow the shell > provider and test things as much as possible. The exec type and > provider are by no means beautiful and cleanly refactored at this > point, and will certainly need more work once we start trying to make > more providers (like for windows). > Added as ticket #6776. -- M ----------------------------------------------------------- When in trouble or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. -- 1920's parody of the maritime general prudential rule ------------------------------------------------------------ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
