S -- I'm currrently looking at the specs for the ssh_authorized_key provider. > There are two tests that give me a headache: > > it "should create the directory if it doesn't exist" do > File.stubs(:exist?).with(@dir).returns false > Dir.expects(:mkdir).with(@dir,0700) > @provider.flush > end > > it "should not create or chown the directory if it already exist" do > File.stubs(:exist?).with(@dir).returns false > Dir.expects(:mkdir).never > @provider.flush > end > > Both tests stub exist? to return false (which is obviously wrong in the > second case) but both tests are expecting different results. Nevertheless > both tests will pass. Am I overlooking something? How can this happen? >
Wow. I'll deffer to Luke on the "what to do about it" issue but apart from that this look like another rspec bug (along the lines of the be_any/all/none... bug, http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/197643) but I'm not seeing the mechanism off the top of my head. It's probably worth figuring out if only to identify other tests that might not be doing what they look like, -- M ----------------------------------------------------------- When in trouble or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. -- 1920's parody of the maritime general prudential rule ------------------------------------------------------------ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
