On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 17:55, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this is a good idea, but it's worth keeping in mind, as I've run into > problems with this log-on-plugin-failure behavior before. > > In particular, there seem to be a lot of cases where people are specifically > looking for the thing that failed, so this behavior can be confusing. > > Like I said, I think this is right, but just keep an eye out for it over time > as we get user feedback. Yeah. I was torn about this: the bug report that drove it was that we were failing in completely unrelated code because it coincidentally looked at the list of all faces, but I worry that it will make the failure modes less obvious. Limiting the capture to the face, and only the face, that was requested is a compromise to help with that, but I wonder if there is some better way to solve the bigger problem. I just can't work out quite what that is... Daniel -- ⎋ Puppet Labs Developer – http://puppetlabs.com ✉ Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> ✆ Contact me via gtalk, email, or phone: +1 (877) 575-9775 ♲ Made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
