On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Daniel Pittman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 07:36, Nigel Kersten <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On May 11, 2011, at 10:01 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote: >>> >>>> Is it possible to access the name of the calling class from inside a >>>> function? >>> >>> You should be able to use '@name'... >> >> Nope. In case I wasn't clear, it's a Puppet function that I'd like to >> make decisions based upon the class it's invoked from. > > I would normally flinch at this, because it sounds like a design > mistake, but this is about using the class that wraps it as an > implicit parameter to help do data lookup, right? > > So, it isn't that it "behaves differently" based on the calling class, > but rather that it uses the class name as an implicit context in which > to perform exactly the same operations every time, no?
Yes. That's a more accurate way to describe it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
