On May 23, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Jacob Helwig wrote: > So, I'm working on #7188 and thought "hey, it would be great if we had > built-in checks that these required parameters were actually specified". > Especially since the current mount type claims that fstype is required, > yet does nothing (other than break things after a successful run) if > it's not specified (tested using 2.7.x on Solaris). > > Unfortunately, it looks like calling isrequired from within the block of > newproperty doesn't actually do this (largely because it doesn't look > like anything is actually checking required?). > > Has setting isrequired ever worked, or are isrequired and required? > Left-overs from an aborted attempt? > > Is there an implemented way of doing 'this parameter is required; fail > at compile time'? Hopefully without having to do a defaultto of a bogus > value, and having a validation failure against that.
It looks like I just never finished the implementation of that. Weird. -- There is only one success - to be able to spend your life in your own way. -- Christopher Morley --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies -|- http://puppetlabs.com -|- http://about.me/lak -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
