On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Luke Kanies <l...@puppetlabs.com> wrote:
> > In my opinion, 'puppet apply' should behave as identically as possible to > 'puppet agent', so it should definitely write the classes file. I didn't > previously have this opinion, but in looking how people use it, and as a > means of reducing option sprawl, I think it's the right direction. > > I'm totally fine with this. As this is a change in the interplay of "agent" and "apply", is this a 2.8.x fix? Or is the impact tiny enough that we can put this into 2.7.x? I ask, as it appears that most of the discussion on the ticket revolved around coming up with a way to fix this issue without changing existing semantics, so that we could get a fix out soon. deepak -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
