----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Sorenson" <eric.soren...@puppetlabs.com> > To: puppet-us...@googlegroups.com > Cc: puppet-dev@googlegroups.com > Sent: Friday, January 3, 2014 5:09:54 PM > Subject: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Status of Data in modules > > > > On Jan 3, 2014, at 5:11 AM, Fabio Sangiovanni <fsangiova...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ok, I get it. First rule of data in modules: you don't talk about data in > > modules. > > > > Hah! No, I just don't like to reply until I have something substantial to > report. Did you see this thread from a couple of weeks ago? It was only on > puppet-dev so if you're following this in puppet-users you may have missed > it: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puppet-dev/f0KrpOtfKRY/discussion > > Next steps out of that were that I'm pulling together a google doc, which I > haven't finished yet due to holidays. > > I'm excited that people are working with the module_data implementation. The > main technical concern I have is forward and backward compatibility: how > should a module express that it needs a particular implementation of DIM?
the same way the module declares it needs puppet > 3, or the new parser and any other related things. These are not hiera questions, but once you solve the underlying problem that a module needs this would just slot into that. At the moment my module is broken on 3.4 because you've changed some internals sadly. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/1154392223.401.1388769263748.JavaMail.zimbra%40devco.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
