On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Felix Frank <
felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 11:23 PM, Erik Dalén wrote:
> > No, removing it means they behave the same as for variables, so they
> > are either global or local. But not passed on through include
> > statements etc.
>
> Or even more specifically, variables have three scoping levels IIRC.
> 1. global scope
> 2. node scope
> 3. local scope
>
> And yes, this has proven amply powerful for variables and ought to
> suffice for resource defaults as well.
>
Sorry for missing the G+ discussion, so different behavior whether the
resource default is in site.pp, v.s. in node {} v.s. class ... {}?
Just to be clear, I want the following behavior (also isn't this how file
backup is configured?):
class { a:
file_line { 'bla::
...
# provider => ruby implied by site.pp resource defaults.
}
}
site.pp:
File_line {
provider => ruby,
}
include a
Thanks,
Nan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CACqVBqBJ%3Dk8Jarqeaxf-CghKy%2BVmSsNgftZpH0cCf%3D%3DECzZuPg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
