On Monday, March 17, 2014 8:36:25 AM UTC-5, James Sweeny wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:19 AM, John Bollinger > <john.bo...@stjude.org<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> >> I love the idea of qualified function name, but that's not what I was >> talking about. Puppet currently suffers from a different kind of scoping >> problem in that different versions of the same function, declared with the >> same name (e.g. by different versions of the same module) may exist in >> different environments, but Puppet can only use one of them -- whichever >> happens to get loaded first, IIRC. Qualified function names do not solve >> this problem. >> >> >> John >> >> > https://jira.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-731 ? > >
Yes, though the issue description seems to focus on types rather than functions. The title mentions functions, and the issue is basically the same for them. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/df462de9-ce22-4a21-b902-dba84b0825bd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
