On Monday, March 17, 2014 8:36:25 AM UTC-5, James Sweeny wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:19 AM, John Bollinger > <[email protected]<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> >> I love the idea of qualified function name, but that's not what I was >> talking about. Puppet currently suffers from a different kind of scoping >> problem in that different versions of the same function, declared with the >> same name (e.g. by different versions of the same module) may exist in >> different environments, but Puppet can only use one of them -- whichever >> happens to get loaded first, IIRC. Qualified function names do not solve >> this problem. >> >> >> John >> >> > https://jira.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-731 ? > >
Yes, though the issue description seems to focus on types rather than functions. The title mentions functions, and the issue is basically the same for them. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/df462de9-ce22-4a21-b902-dba84b0825bd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
