On 2014-25-07 3:32, Spencer Krum wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the correct time to mention this, but I wonder
if you considered arrays of hashes in decision eight?

I guess they are not really arrays of hashes but whatever this is:

[

   '/root/file1' => {'owner' => 'root'},
   '/root/file1' => {'owner' => 'nibz'},
]

Right now we often use arrays of hashes with the create_resources
function when we need to specify parameters. This is similar to the
effect of how arrays passed into resources as title behave.

I think it would be awesome if we could pass what we currently pass into
create_resources into resource instantiations.


You mean like this?

  $x = [
    '/root/file1' => {'owner' => 'root'},
    '/root/file1' => {'owner' => 'nibz'},
  ]
  file { $x: }

When we discuss this, we preferred that the iteration is made explicit. You can use the same data structure, and do this:

 $x.each |$title, $attributes| { file { $title: * => $attributes } }

Since that is much more descriptive. (In fact, that is pretty much what the implementation of create resources is).

- henrik

Thanks,
Spencer


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Henrik Lindberg
<henrik.lindb...@cloudsmith.com <mailto:henrik.lindb...@cloudsmith.com>>
wrote:

    On 2014-25-07 2:32, Andy Parker wrote:

        DECISION TWO

            Resource instantiations are value producing expressions

        The expression based grammar that puppet 4 will be based on changed
        almost everything into a general expression, which allowed a lot of
        composition that wasn't possible before. This didn't change resource
        expressions. Resource expressions could not be assigned ($a = notify
        {hi:}). That is being changed. This removes several odd corners
        in the
        grammar and makes it all more consistent. It is also highly unlikely
        that it would be removed later (principle 1). The value of a
        resource
        expression is a reference to the created resource, or an array of
        references if there is more than one.

        QUESTION: should the value always be an array of references?
        That would
        make it much more predictable.

        DECISION THREE

            Resource instantiation expressions will not be allowed in
        dangerous
        locations

        Once resource expressions can be placed anywhere there are a few
        places
        where they would actually just do more harm than good (principle
        2). One
        example is as a parameter default (define a($b = notify {hi:}) {}).

        DECISION FOUR

            The LHS of a resource *instantiation* expression can be an
        expression

        What?!? This means you can do:

            $a = notify
            $a { hi: }

        Once again, in clearing up odd cases in the grammar this is
        opened up to
        us. This is a very powerful feature to have available. Since this is
        very useful and fits well into the grammar I don't see this being a
        temporary thing that would then have to go away later (principle 1).

        DECISION FIVE (how many of these are there?)

            A resource with a title of default provides the default
        parameter
        values for other resources in the same instantiation expression.

        Thanks to David Schmitt for this idea!

        Since we aren't going to change the behavior of resource default
        expressions (Notify { ... }) it seems like there needs to be
        something
        done to provide a better, safer way of specifying defaults. This
        will allow:

            notify {
              default: message => hi;
              bye: }

        The result will be a resource of type Notify with title bye and
        message
        hi. It is highly unlikely that this will go away (principle 1)
        as it is
        syntactic sugar for specifying the parameters for every resource.

        DECISION SIX

            There will be a splat operator for resource instantiation
        expressions

        To make the default resources (decision five) really useful
        there needs
        to be a way to reuse the same values across multiple defaults. The
        current, dangerous, semantics of resource default expressions
        skirt this
        issue by making defaults part of the (dynamic) evaluation scope. In
        order to make the default resources nearly as useful but much
        safer, we
        need to add a way to allow reuse of defaults across multiple
        resource
        instantiation expressions explicitly (principle 2).

            $owner_mode = { owner => andy, mode => '777' } # gotta make
        it secure
            file { default: *=> $owner_mode;
              '/home/andy/.bashrc': ;
              '/home/andy/.ssh/id_rsa': ;
            }

            file { '/etc/passwd': *=> $owner_mode }

        As a side note, do you see what can now be done?

            $a = notify
            $b = hi
            $c = { message => bye }
            $a { $b: *=> $c }

        DECISION SEVEN

            undef is not allowed as a title

        Not much to say here. notify { undef: } fails (or anything that
        evaluates to undef)


    DECISION SEVEN AND 3/4

    A title expression must result in a String value, or Array of String
    values.. No regular expressions, hashes, booleans, numbers etc.

    No magic turning a title into a string if it is not.

        DECISION EIGHT

            An array as a title expands to individual resource instantiation
        expressions with titles of the elements of the array.

        This isn't really too far off from the current semantics, no
        real change
        here. It is only to call out that we are formalizing that as the
        semantics. An empty array ends up being a noop (no resources
        instantiated). An array that contains undef will produce an
        error (see
        decision seven). The value default can be an element of the
        array and
        will produce the default section for the resources being
        instantiated
        (as pointless as that seems since they will all have the same body).

        DECISION NINE

           Decisions two through eight do not apply to resource default or
        resource override expressions.

        Just to make it clear that decision one still holds.

        CONCLUSION

        I think that covers it all. This will be reflected by a revert
        to some
        code, modifying the grammar, adding some new evaluation
        capabilities,
        including tests, and updating the specification. All of this is
        falling
        under PUP-501, PUP-511, and PUP-2898 in some way shape or form.

        This email was to record the decisions; make them public; double
        check
        that Henrik, Joshua and I all had the same understanding of
        them; and
        give another chance to everyone to weigh in.

        I did have one question that I uncovered as I was writing this
        up. Some
        feedback on that would be great as well.

        --
        Andrew Parker
        a...@puppetlabs.com <mailto:a...@puppetlabs.com>
        <mailto:a...@puppetlabs.com <mailto:a...@puppetlabs.com>>

        Freenode: zaphod42
        Twitter: @aparker42
        Software Developer

        *Join us at PuppetConf 2014 <http://www.puppetconf.com/>, September
        22-24 in San Francisco*
        /Register by May 30th to take advantage of the Early Adopter
        discount
        <http://links.puppetlabs.com/__puppetconf-early-adopter
        <http://links.puppetlabs.com/puppetconf-early-adopter>>
        //—//save $349!/


        --
        You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
        Groups "Puppet Developers" group.
        To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
        it, send
        an email to puppet-dev+unsubscribe@__googlegroups.com
        <mailto:puppet-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
        <mailto:puppet-dev+__unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
        <mailto:puppet-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>>.

        To view this discussion on the web visit
        
https://groups.google.com/d/__msgid/puppet-dev/__CANhgQXu3HVrWJrTnMgYvbY6%__3DR8B%__3DvVgts2Uqmwjtj6eJRJsH7g%__40mail.gmail.com
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CANhgQXu3HVrWJrTnMgYvbY6%3DR8B%3DvVgts2Uqmwjtj6eJRJsH7g%40mail.gmail.com>
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/__msgid/puppet-dev/__CANhgQXu3HVrWJrTnMgYvbY6%__3DR8B%__3DvVgts2Uqmwjtj6eJRJsH7g%__40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=__email&utm_source=footer
        
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CANhgQXu3HVrWJrTnMgYvbY6%3DR8B%3DvVgts2Uqmwjtj6eJRJsH7g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>>.

        For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/__optout
        <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.



    --

    Visit my Blog "Puppet on the Edge"
    http://puppet-on-the-edge.__blogspot.se/
    <http://puppet-on-the-edge.blogspot.se/>


    --
    You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "Puppet Developers" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscribe@__googlegroups.com
    <mailto:puppet-dev%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
    To view this discussion on the web visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/__msgid/puppet-dev/lqsaff%2438h%__241%40ger.gmane.org
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/lqsaff%2438h%241%40ger.gmane.org>.

    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/__optout
    <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.




--
Spencer Krum
(619)-980-7820

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Puppet Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
<mailto:puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CADt6FWNcOa2vaxx_vNn%2BNTX1tmngeF2KEi0mspQcCxUBrh3mYg%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/CADt6FWNcOa2vaxx_vNn%2BNTX1tmngeF2KEi0mspQcCxUBrh3mYg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--

Visit my Blog "Puppet on the Edge"
http://puppet-on-the-edge.blogspot.se/

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet 
Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/lqtj6g%24png%241%40ger.gmane.org.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to