I received marketing email this morning about "Puppet Application Orchestration". I'm guessing this is related to PRFC-6 and the recent PR's for PUP-XXXXs that are not publicly accessible.
If this feature is indeed related to PRFC-6, the index page lists this PRFC as being in "draft" status. Per PRFC-0, the approval process is supposed to be draft -> posted -> submitted -> candidate -> funded -> completed. I don't recall any discussion on this list other than the issues that can up with "application" became a reserved word. To be clear, I am not complaining about features being developed behind closed doors. Rather, I'm wondering why the PRFC process was [potentially] not followed for a major feature? Is there not enough community engagement? Is it too slow? Is it a failed experiment at this point? -Josh -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/560D88ED.3090806%40hoblitt.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
