Thanks, Luke That confirms what I was thinking. Not a huge issue, I suspect; for more immediate purposes, I probably would rather force myself to sign manually anyway, for now. By the time I am ready to enable autosigning, we'll probably be umpteen versions newer...
Thanks again! On Oct 13, 11:12 am, Luke Kanies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 10, 2008, at 4:05 PM, zoniguana wrote: > > > > > Is there a way that I can simply use the hostname, without the domain, > > to get an autosigned cert? > > Alternatively, can I grant access to a block of IPs and have those > > certs autosigned? > > Do I need to add IP/name relations to the hosts file on the > > pupetmaster to get it to recognize that they are one and the same? > > Autosigning does not currently support IP addresses, and you must use > fully qualified names. > > -- > The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one > persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all > progress depends on the unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Luke Kanies |http://reductivelabs.com|http://madstop.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
