> well imho what is talked about in this thread is an onlyif
> parameter for
> a resource, so unless/onlyif as a metaparameter. Right?
>
> BUT this won't be something like:
>
> if File.exist?('/foo/bar') {
> package{'foobar': ensure => present }
> }
>
> this will be like:
>
> package{'foobar':
> ensure => installed,
> onlyif => 'test -f /foo/bar',
> }
>
> but your were suggesting something like:
>
> --- quote ---
> In pseudo-code:
>
> if file_exists("/opt/orange_app") {
> # file exists, load the module
> include orange
> }
Yes, you're right, I mistakenly construed that what they were discussing would
directly solve my problem, which it wouldn't. It's apples and oranges - both
fruits I would enjoy but not the same fruits.
> Besides that, if we are talking about onlyif/unless as a
> metaparameter:
> There have even been recently some work to provide unless
> as a
> metaparameter. See "possible #651 patch" thread on the
> puppet-dev list
> and maybe also have a look at bug #651.
Ok, I'll check that out.
But now I'm confused again...
You say that this is possible and may even be implemented soon:
package { 'foobar':
ensure => installed,
onlyif => 'test -f /foo/bar',
}
But something like this is pretty much out-of-the-question?
$foo_exists = client_exec('test -f /foo/bar')
if $foo_exists == 0 {
# file exists, load the module
include foobar
}
Both scenarios involve a decision based on output from the client.
Perhaps I just need to approach it a different way: create a new type and put
all my custom logic in there?
homemade_application { 'foobar':
ensure => installed,
onlyif => 'test -f /foo/bar',
}
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---