Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote: > Brice Figureau <brice-pup...@daysofwonder.com> writes: > >> Can you try with a newer rails/active record? This one is a little >> bit old, and I'm not sure there aren't some bugs. I vaguely >> remember that puppet required rails 2.2, but I might be wrong.
Well, puppet 0.25 doesn't refuse to run with rails 2.1 and 0.25 got some patches to allow better support for 2.1, so it's not completely "unsupported" from a user perspective. The wiki does list >= 2.2.2 for 0.25 and <= 2.2.2 for 0.24 though. > Will try. I was hoping I could get away with using whatever is in > EPEL; has anybody tested this kind of setup? It's definitely unfortunate that what is in EPEL suffers from this bug. I would love to see either puppet or rails there patched to work around this. I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/572722 for this issue but haven't heard anything back from the rails packagers yet. There was a bug in the Puppet Labs redmine about these leaks, but I think it was closed. I need to find that bug again and reopen it. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A neurosis is a secret you don't know you're keeping. -- Kenneth Tynan
pgpFk4mncMrw8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
